Had an inquiry come in via Twitter from @ecoDomestica and @ChrisInEdmonton asking the following:
Why is Dursban, an insecticide that kills frogs & tadpoles, being used as part of #yeg mosquito control program?
I inquired with the city’s Office of the Environment and received the following information:
There is no evidence that the amounts of Dursban used, and the targeted nature of the City of Edmonton’s program has had any effect on amphibian populations.
While laboratory trials with large doses of directly injected organophosphates have shown effects on developing amphibians, this does not match the kinds of exposures amphibians receive in field conditions.
Both wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) and boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata) remain abundant in all suitable habitats in the Edmonton area. The City continually monitors populations of non-target organisms and has not seen any decline in amphibian populations. All native species of frogs are thriving in habitats treated by the control program.
As with fluoride, all things in moderation I suppose.



{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
My concern is that it is bad enough to be banned by the Federal Government, and the ban was only lifted to deal with mosquitos who may carry West Nile- which these mosquitos do not.
My major concern is sadly not for frogs- but for my children. While they may not play near the spraying areas, they are living in a city that chooses a short cut and is taking advantage of the federal lift on the ban to take care of nuisance mosquitos rather than the dangerous ones the ban was lifted for.
I am angry about this because this is the exact type of thing that makes people feel apathetic about democracy. Obviously there is something wrong with Dursban if it was banned in the first place, but now Edmonton has just “decided” it’s FINE! Don’t WORRY about it! Just pretend we’re all okay!
My children will be just as disgruntled as I am about the government, and that makes me angry.
Thanks to Mike Jenkins with the city’s Office of Environment for the following further detail quoted below: